THE HAVES & THE HAVES NOT

There is some individual who was raised with morals, values, and self-respect subsequently there was an individual who was just raised without principles.  What are the differences? That individual who was raised with morals, values, and self-respect is referred to as THE HAVES. Consequently, that individual who was just raised without principles is referred to as THE HAVES NOT.  Why are they referred to as such because THE HAVES were educated to distinguish THE HAVES NOT when they are approached by those with their pants saggy because it senses some sort of Ignorance?  Also, it displays that some guy doesn’t have the capability of presenting themselves in the company of others. This concept is extremely important to that individual who is planning to parent children.  Why? When individuals have children the parents are the ones who are supposed to teach their child how to present themselves respectfully in the company of a woman. It’s the parent’s responsibility that their sons are respectfully presenting their selves versus wearing their pants sagging.

There is a disconnection when parents accept this sort of fashion trend from their sons and encourage their behavior by permitting it. Furthermore, if parents accept this kind of fashion trend then the children will never comprehend the downside such as health issues when they are up in age. When these youngsters become older they are going to have to deal with having terrible posture because of the fashion their legs are situated when their pants sag. Moreover, these youngsters will suffer from hip deterioration, also dilemmas with their lower back. Is that what you want parents for your children?  In life, there are always causes and effects, and because they do not wear their pants in such a manner it is going to cause health issues long-term.  Also, there is no turning back from these youngster's body disfigurement. This is why parents should be active in their son’s lives and give a damn about the damage when their sons are wearing saggy pants.

In addition, children will be children, thus; if parents do not educate them how are they supposed to learn, and teach their children. It is said that children are our future but it is unforeseen because some children aren’t educated, and some children are irresponsible and without the proper guidance. Attention: THE HAVES, become very cautious of the HAVES NOT. Do not accept anything that comes your way, and become extremely aware of what you are seeking from any guy. If THE HAVES NOT parents are not educating them about ethics, therefore; he will not be able to measure up to you-THE HAVES. Moreover, many things are acceptable for males but are unacceptable for females. This is a double standard because if something is acceptable for one it ought to be acceptable for the other.  I think if individual become educated on the history of saggy pants subsequently a change may be a probability because some individual transforms to make certain things their lifestyle.

Furthermore, for changes to transpire Congress will have to get involved, therefore; forcing a change such as ticketing THE HAVES NOT that wear saggy pants in public. If it has to come to that for change so be it because this has been excessive for too long, and the damage is already done from a health standpoint. For those who have an open mind, think about the millions of hip replacements that are going to take place because of the HAVES NOT wearing saggy pants. In fact, hypothetically the price of hip replacement is 30,000 simply imagine THE HAVES NOT that wear saggy pants having this surgery performed on them. “ching, ching, let the cash register ring”. That’s a lot of surgeries, and money spent on each has not, therefore; the doctor's benefits again when hip surgery is performed. Actually, the longer it is permitted for THE HAVES NOT to wear saggy pants meaning further hospital claims and the doctors get richer at the HAVES NOT an expense. When is the time going to come when others stop being a part of the problem and be a part of the solution?

By Kimmie Merritt

March 24, 2016